Skip to content

October 16, 2025

Key Discussions

Claude Code Pattern Evolution

Significant observations about Claude Code's performance improvements over time:

  • Claude Code demonstrated substantial improvement on .NET Function App project once solid patterns were established
  • Initial setup phase showed significant struggles with scaffolding and general infrastructure
  • After establishing patterns in the repository, development became approximately 90% hands-off
  • Minor backend changes handled smoothly by Claude Code once patterns were in place

.NET Function App Development Challenges

Discovery of substantial documentation inconsistencies affecting AI-assisted development:

  • Legacy vs Modern Models: Function Apps have two distinct approaches:
  • Legacy in-process model (older approach)
  • New isolated model (runs each function in isolated container instances)
  • Documentation Problems: Microsoft completely changed scaffolding approaches between models
  • Conflicting Information: Online docs and examples often vague about which model they reference
  • AI Impact: Claude Code made numerous mistakes by mixing patterns from both models

Technical Highlights

Pattern-Based Development Effectiveness

The .NET Function App project revealed important insights about AI-assisted development:

  • Bootstrapping Challenge: Initial project setup without established patterns proves difficult for AI tools
  • Pattern Recognition: Once consistent patterns exist in codebase, AI tools become highly effective
  • Documentation Quality Impact: Conflicting or unclear documentation significantly impacts AI performance
  • Model Evolution: Microsoft's architectural changes created confusion in training data and documentation

Development Infrastructure Maturity

Evidence of how established patterns improve AI assistance:

  • Consistent project structure and conventions enable reliable AI-driven development
  • Well-defined patterns reduce ambiguity that leads to AI mistakes
  • Documentation quality directly correlates with AI tool effectiveness

Project Updates

.NET Function App Project

  • Successfully transitioned from struggling initial setup to effective ongoing development
  • Established clear patterns that enable reliable AI assistance
  • Resolved confusion between legacy in-process and modern isolated Function App models
  • Achieved 90% hands-off development workflow once patterns were established

Themes & Insights

AI Tool Learning Curves

Pattern of AI tools struggling with initial project setup but excelling once conventions are established:

  • Importance of clear, consistent patterns in enabling AI assistance
  • Documentation quality as a critical factor in AI tool effectiveness
  • Value of investing time in establishing solid patterns early in projects

Microsoft Platform Challenges

Specific challenges with Microsoft's platform evolution affecting AI-assisted development:

  • Architectural changes creating confusion between legacy and modern approaches
  • Documentation inconsistency hampering both human and AI understanding
  • Need for explicit model specification in examples and tutorials

Development Workflow Evolution

Observation of AI tool improvement correlation with codebase maturity:

  • Initial scaffolding remains a challenge for AI tools
  • Pattern recognition enables sophisticated AI assistance
  • Established conventions dramatically improve AI effectiveness

Technical Solutions

Function App Model Clarity

Key distinctions for future .NET Function App development:

  • In-Process Model: Legacy approach with integrated hosting
  • Isolated Model: Modern approach with containerized function execution
  • Documentation Requirements: Always specify which model is being used
  • Pattern Consistency: Establish clear conventions early to enable AI assistance

This discussion builds on previous themes around AI tool effectiveness and the importance of established patterns, while highlighting specific challenges with Microsoft platform documentation and architectural evolution.